...
(can be filled from google report)
Slides
Notes
EF: Is it possible to discuss transfer of material to the new infrastructure and discuss the governance?
JK: May need to take this outside of the meeting but will circulate material and ask for feedback
EF: Is there a link between the review device tree and text based configuration?
RK: Config wizard puts annotations in the header file. Can also manually edit the file
EF: Is it separate from Device Tree?
RK: Might be link. Config wizard is well understood. Need to check if the concept is the right one but it’s discussed in the next slides.
LM: Need some time to review the proposal - hard to tell in this context.
RK: Would like to plan a discussion session next week and form an opinion.
EF: COMSIS-Zone - idea is to reuse the concept of zone file and diversify it.
RK: Memory and peripheral handling for secure and non-secure. Might be a good idea to go over this block. Had a deep dive on Device Tree. Criticism is non-standard data format (not XML) and has functionality gaps. Perhaps we can harmonise the concepts
LM: Plan to generalise to any project including bootloader plus application
RK: Yes similar to multiproject
JK: Does it make sense to review next week or the week after?
EF: Think we need more than one week
[Presentation on ‘vidx2pidx’]
EF: In GitHub have an addional state of ToDo - should we map this to Jira?
JK: Once it’s in Jira it becomes part of the backlog - so equivalent to ToDo.
EF: Don’t know what is done in other projects. to map the user story thread to a pull request - not sure how to manage this.
JK: Need to show we are treating each PR fairly.