Date
Date Participants
Data Model Gaps by NXP
#20/#71
RK: Input to Handlebars should be in json format
FR: This is possible if doesn’t need to be human readable
RK: Generator-owned components - could be hidden. Generator owned and invisible attributes proposed to be merged - any issues?
JK: Could be a passed through component without being generator owned.
FR: For a better name need to understand the usecase.
RK: Refer to issue #100 attribute “invisible”.
FR: Are we defining primary and secondary components?
ED: What is the purpose of the invisible component? If something goes wrong, how would you present it to the user?
EF: Isn’t it a way to have a meta component or one encapsulated in another?
RK: In principle yes. For the USB example makes no sense unless you have components which use the USB controller.
MD: “Selected by context” rather than “invisible” is preferable
EF: We need to think about it before confirming.
#171
FR: Why can’t csolution do this?
VG: SCI won’t be aware of yaml stuff
RK: cprj is standalone description. Propose to keep cprj file.
FR: Not sure why yaml is out of SCI.
RK: yaml file is more flexible. Depends on setup of environment.
EF: Re alternative path - ST believes the user should be able to define the directory structure
LM: For packs
Holt Sun’s presentation
JK: Let’s continue the discussion re project path and we’ll look at it.
CMSIS Annual Update Webinar next week, so no Open-CMSIS-Pack Technical Meeting.