Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Agenda

...

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

...

Time

...

Item

...

Presenter

...

Notes

✅ Action items

  •  

Excerpt
nameAgenda

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion

  • AJB: mentioned the xen-vhost-master PoC is working

    • SS: is it using the xen libs?

    • VK: yes at the moment, slowly migrating to rust

    • SS: did you need Epams non-upstream patches?

    • VK: yes

    • SS: does this integrate with xl create?

    • VK: not yet, start manually

      • should send out an email tomorrow with details of the repos

    • SS: a bit of automation is missing for the disk

  • AJB:

    • sprint planning

  • SS: we are going to work on qemu (IOREQ Xen PV on ARM)

    • AJB: the kvm/tcg patches are the disaggregation patches

    • SS: for speed stick to current x86 xen model

    • SS: introduce Vikram

  • AB: I have a question about Xen on Cortex-R52

    • SS: we want to port to R52, static partitioning, dom0less

    • SS: linux not really required

    • AB: don’t want to encourage mmu-less linux, please let it die in peace

    • SS: we not planning on it, maybe useful for testing but unlikely for production

    • AJB: is there interest in expanding Cortex-R profile support for QEMU

    • SS: yes, there is interest, talk to Edgar

    • AB: been looking at expanding “virt” support for other CPU types

    • SS: that would be interesting

      • could have virt devices on “random” CPU types

    • AJB: maybe a virtualised test machine for multiple CPU types?

      • AB: kernel support for “Goldfish” machine which does that

      • AJB: is it documented

      • AB: a bit

      • AB: mostly virt with minimal HW where it makes sense

✅ Action items

⤴ Decisions