Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Open-CMSIS-Pack Technical Meeting 2022-01-11

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Slides

Notes

Activities from Past Weeks

FR: PR#63: think it’s a good way forward

JK: Should we go with first PR or modify - if modify then who would edit it?

RK: Take as an action for next week.

FR: No issue with handlebars: - started with a-zone file.

RK: For handlebars - r-zone file is the resources, a-zone file is how they are used. f-zone file generated and is input for handlebars.

FR: So only need knowledge of a-zone and r-zone file. f-zone is generated?

RK: Yes. a-zone file will be replaced by yaml file.

FR: Should focus on content of a-zone where we need to introduce additional contents.

EF: f-zone is a production artefact?

RK: Yes (“F” means Freemarker input). Temporary file and can be deleted.

FR: Digital Signing: Maybe need to clarify usecases based on digital signing e.g revocation.

Project Manager - Specification

EF: Can we have several RTE folders?

RK: Yes - they would be target specific

LM: Version in discussion is still in Daniel’s account - not yet merged. Is the discussion closed on naming RTE vs layer or a variable that could be renamed

RK: Had to start somewhere. Can propose a configuration option.

LM: <RTE> allows for possible customisation

FR: What if want to deliver my own component and settings - no way to do it at component level?

RK: 3rd party component can have own config file. When you copy the component you have the original file and the config version. When you get a new version of pack can inform you there’s a new version of the config file.

FR: Follow the intention for project as a deliverable. Just want to say I have a dependency on a component and want to deliver the configuration with it.

RK: This is exactly what layers are for.

LM: What happens in the case of downgrading component versions?

RK: At the moment the situation is based on upgrade but downgrading is possible

JK: Downgrading and then upgrading would lose information. Depends on how far you want to go with full file history.

EF: Does it allow managing different instances of the same component?

JK: Not able to have different instances with different versions. Would be four files. Each component would have the reference configuration plus their own configuration.

JK: Benefits of the approach: 3-way merge, removing need for version information - it’s fully with the files.

RK: And all other options are ugly.

JK: Please provide feedback.

Recording

  • No labels