Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Open-CMSIS-Pack Technical Meeting 2023-09-05

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

(Can be filled from Zoom meeting report)

Slides

 

Error rendering macro 'viewpdf' : Failed to find attachment with Name 23wk37_Open-CMSIS-Pack_TM.pdf

Meeting Notes

Project Boards

Open-CMSIS-Pack Specification

#246

CMSIS-Toolbox 2.1

Version released

CMSIS-Toolbox 2.2

Component Taxonomy

(DJ slides)

Protege taxonomy tool: https://protege.stanford.edu/

DJ: A script was extracted the categories and manually imported into the tool

JK: Tool could help us to understand but in the end we need to make decisions about how we structure.

DJ: Also provides a single source of truth and is more valuable than the schema.

RK: How more valuable than the schema?

DJ: Benefit is the rules (object properties) defined between the categories e.g. pack-contains-components. Rules can be ‘has sibling’ or ‘has mother/parent’.

Proposal

Some Cclass names to review and specify further

What role should Cbundle play?

Create a dedicated respository for the taxonomy definition pack.

RK: OK for company names but need to agree meaning on English words.

KD: Examples of company name issues. People use their company names for visibility. Would be more restrictive on the Cclass

Generator Workflow

(RK slides)

PH: Does this replace the previous proposal?

RK: Yes, have renamed the file and propose not to enable features that are not relevant.

Issues to Review

#206

#1109

#1111

#974

CMakeLists Proposal - leave comments and feedback in #1044

Meeting Recording

(Zoom recording uploaded via Files & Images)

  • No labels