2021-1-11 Meeting Meeting notes
- Mike Holmes
Owned by Mike Holmes
Meeting Details
Topic: linaro-open-discussion meeting
Time: Jan 11 , 2020 10.00 AM London
Join Zoom Meeting
https://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/4417312160
Meeting ID: 441 731 2160
One tap mobile
+16465588656,,4417312160# US (New York)
+16699009128,,4417312160# US (San Jose)
Dial by your location
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
877 853 5247 US Toll-free
888 788 0099 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 441 731 2160
Find your local number: https://linaro-org.zoom.us/u/aUcYpPkSC
Attendees
- Mike
- Tim Chen ( Intel )
- Zhangfei Gao (Hisilicon LT)
- Shameerali KT
- Jammy
- Mortenson (Arm)
- Lorenzo (Arm)
- Dietmar (Arm)
- Valentine (Arm)
- James Morse ()
- Jonathan Cameron (Huawei)
- Vincent
- Barry Song (Huawei)
- Chris Redpath (arm)
- Sudeep Holla (arm)
- Ulf
- Bill F
- Loic Pallardy (ST)
- Guodong Xu (Hisilicon LT)
- Salil Mehta (Huawei)
- Mattias Brugger (SUSE ?)
- ZengTao ( ? )
- wanghuiqiang (Huawei)
Agenda
Confirmed topics
- Lorenzo Pieralisi : Arm : Scheduler topology: cluster scheduler awareness -
- Lorenzo Pieralisi : Arm : ACPI CPU hotplug
- AOB
- Jonathon
Meeting notes
- Lorenzo Pieralisi : Arm : Scheduler topology: cluster scheduler awareness
- Song Bao Hua
- talking to slides
- Better performance in single cluster vs multiple - lead to the investigation, used Jonathon patch to test Linux scheduler.
- hackbench better with select_idle_sibling. it collates the waking up of a cluster
- Vincent, Morten there are multiple topics
- Morten
- how to get information
- scheduling policy - this first
- Need a wider discussion. Made some comments on Friday
- Vincent
- Scheduler policy - adding scheduling level, I don't see any pushback and there is perf improvement
- Sometimes you want to spread and other times cluster - HB there are 40 threads, there are few idle states, it is about spreading tasks. Patches should fit on Peter's wakeup patches, NUMA scheduling will be most challenging.
- Dietmar - will this scan and fall back to standard LNC? (V3) VG: cant loop, but in a new approach, it is OK as you hit each CPU only once.
- Morten, when is it good to pack vs spread them? What is the measure to understand which approach to take. And example two tasks with a lot of shared data will be a problem.
- Vincent, need to look at previous CPU being idle. migrating may happen to move tasks from one cluster to another, need to complete task before load balance takes effect
- JC: if this is spread across NUMA nodes we have many more than 40 CPUs
- VG: There will not be any on the longer one.
- DE: we don't have an example where we chose a policy based on the workload
- Lorenzo - we have covered topic one of this 35 mins spent, let's move to the list where we can
- Tim Chen
- X86 will also need this concept
- could have tasks that share memory without a wakeup relationship
- SBH - userspace may need to provide information
- JC: we can gather the info even if it is not accurate initially, we perhaps need to gather data separately
- X86 does not use PPTT - but there are extra levels of topology information
- TC we are using L2
- JC we don't have a way to represent L3 tag cache
- Die is no available to userspace
- Any concerns on extra complexity?
- LP: userspace should be architectural - JC: sort of agree, with generic naming, MR: why don't you just dump PPTT, JC: kernel is not always enabled to get dump MC: we could patch this.
- SBH will send a V4 at this time
- Morten
- Song Bao Hua
LP - AOB
- Lorenzo Pieralisi : Arm : ACPI CPU hotplug
- Progress with discussions - 2 PSCI solutions, QEmu changes or use ACPI as it is in X86 world
- Working inside Arm as things firm up
- For hotplug in a VM, suspect it relies on userspace - is actually align in userspace, Salil Mehta that is correct.
- SM: at QEMU level you need an event, LP: in guest, there is something to be done, SM yes, we are using sysfs - Justin He was using VSOCK event -, we are doing it manually for testing
- RMR - we sorted it out, need to get it done specs will follow
- JC - don't re-enumerate PCI - discussion with Jean-Phillip