Open-CMSIS-Pack Technical Meeting 2023-01-17
Participants
David Jurajda
Evgueni Driouk
Bill Fletcher
Daniel Brondani
Joachim Krech
Jonatan Antoni
Sourabh
Luís Tonicha
Erik Mållberg
Will Lord
Reinhard Keil
Frédéric Ruellé
Eric Finco
Vincent Grenet
Maxime DORTEL
Vincent Grenet
Holt Sun
Kyle Dando
Slides
Meeting Notes
Feedback on Linker Scripts #655
RK: think we have to implement this and try it in practice
EF: On ST’s side we have a solution. Don’t see that this conflicts.
C Startup Code
RK: Applies to very few devices. Need to dig deeper into this problem. It’s not completely solved.
For Review
JK: Need another decision committee to clear up the backlog
[Action BillF to schedule the committee meeting]
#188
RK: May take a while to transition all boards
#184
RK: There is a process to add new compilers to CMSIS-toolbox.
JK/DB: It should work except for the schema check
VG: It’s working today.
RK: Company wanting to add their compiler could make a pull request to the schema.
#182
MD: Why should we skip this?
JK: We said it was an optional feature when we added it
EF: This plus #173, #174 have been pushed by ST. Would like to introduce the idea of a hardware project and will come with a more detailed proposal.
#181
RK: What would be the default?
WL: There’s been no discussion on what would be the default.
RK: Suggest to specify the top image is the default
#173
#174
#186
#190
RK: Agree this would be good practice. Was a problem with the AWS packs. Can document it but would not make it mandatory. Maybe should review the repository where the process is defined and add documentation https://github.com/Open-CMSIS-Pack/gen-pack
KD: Want to know the source of the packs. If the pdsc isn’t in the repo we don’t know where they generated it from.
Are We able to link multiple cprojects into the build process?
VG: OK (pragmatic)
#607
#662
#659
EF: Just for information or you consider it will be used.
RK: Just for information - basically documentation.
JK: Plan to put into CMSIS-toolbox: 2.0
Meeting Recording
