Open-CMSIS-Pack Technical Meeting 2023-02-07

Owned by Bill Fletcher, created
Last updated: Feb 09, 2023 by Joachim Krech
2 min read

 Participants

Joachim Krech

Sourabh

Wilfried

Daniel Brondani

Bill Fletcher

Luís Tonicha

Samuel Hultgren

Maxime DORTEL

Vincent Grenet

David Jurajda

Reinhard Keil

Graham Hammond

Erik Mållberg

Eric Finco

Vincent Grenet

Kyle Dando

Slides

 

Meeting Notes

Change Board Review

JK: #75 - drive to conclusion or out of scope for CMSIS Toolbox 2.0?

RK: Problem with long path names?

JK: There’s an issue for that.

#434 - still a couple of items we don’t have in the cbuild yaml.

RK: #607 - to my knowledge already in the specification and we can start implementing. Will double check if it’s in the specification.

JK: #195 Seems a bit of an inconsistency. Looking for some expert inputs.

RK: Need an inventory of the tools/readers we are using.

RK: #205 - think this goes beyond CMSIS Toolbox 2.0

EF: View on the interim phase - are resources managed outside the toolbox?

RK: See if it is feasible for 2.1 and how we deal with MPU protection. Need to think about TrustZone. Aiming to release CMSIS Toolbox 2.0 by June this year.

EF: Guess you would like to support projects based on M33. What would the message be for developers?

RK: Goes beyond the SAU setup. There is no tooling that supports the peripherals and the like. Can take a look how to extend the 2.0 Toolbox but not start working on it now.

SH: #207 think we should clarify how genlayer properties should be used.

JK: For generators who don’t know where the genlayer is need to manage the backwards compatibility.

JK: #699 Flags can contradict

VG: Have limited ability to check. Agree the proposal.

JK: Use these environment variables for listing. Don’t want to have 1 cmake file per version.

#206 Re-running generators and dry-run mode

#637 Dependencies on Components

EF: Suggest we stabilize before switching.

#655 Feedback on Linker script proposal

 

 

 

Meeting Recording